On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
The following sentence is a win announcement, and this sentence serves
to clearly label it as one. ais523 has a score of at least 100.
Therefore, by rule 2187, I satisfy the Winning Condition of High Score;
I do not satisfy any Losing Conditions,
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I initiate an equity case regarding the PRS, whose parties are ehird,
BobTHJ, comex, Murphy, Quazie, Wooble, Pavitra, ais523, and root.
ais523 should only have gotten 1 point from the above cashout since e
only had 1 PV. He
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:52, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following sentence is a win announcement, and this sentence serves
to clearly label it as one. ais523 has a score of at least 100.
Therefore, by rule 2187, I satisfy the Winning Condition of High Score;
I do not satisfy
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:52, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following sentence is a win announcement, and this sentence serves
to clearly label it as one. ais523 has a score of at least 100.
Therefore, by rule 2187, I satisfy the Winning
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 15:07, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:52, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following sentence is a win announcement, and this sentence serves
to clearly label it as one. ais523 has a score
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 14:07 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Roger Hicks wrote:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 10:52, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The following sentence is a win announcement, and this sentence serves
to clearly label it as one. ais523 has a score of at least
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Alex Smith wrote:
On Mon, 2008-10-27 at 14:07 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
As is, I don't think there's a lot that can be done. The PRS was acting
not-in-accordance-with-expectations due to a mistake, so that can be
solved equitably, but the gamestate will have changed a lot
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I agree that criminal proceedings aren't reasonable, I'm more thinking of
the equity; what is an equitable solution to making a mistake that
resets all other members' points?
ps. Maybe equity would be me putting a big word ILLEGAL next to the win
On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 5:25 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 27 Oct 2008, Kerim Aydin wrote:
I agree that criminal proceedings aren't reasonable, I'm more thinking of
the equity; what is an equitable solution to making a mistake that
resets all other members' points?
ps.
9 matches
Mail list logo
