Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Primo Shares

2007-06-20 Thread Ed Murphy
root wrote: I disagree with both of you. The sqrt(2) shares that I transferred to you were created by charter-specified methods (IPO or CFO salary); and I didn't just offer them, I flat-out transferred them according to the old section 19. Yes, I agree with you on that count, but section 19

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Primo Shares

2007-06-20 Thread Ian Kelly
On 6/20/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: root wrote: I disagree with both of you. The sqrt(2) shares that I transferred to you were created by charter-specified methods (IPO or CFO salary); and I didn't just offer them, I flat-out transferred them according to the old section 19.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Primo Shares

2007-06-20 Thread Roger Hicks
Section 19 is broken, in that it attempts to contradict reality. Neither section 19 nor the issue that created it did anything to deal directly with shares already in the possession of non-shareholders. Reality is that Primo Corp shares are fictitious, and none of us own any. They're

DIS: Re: BUS: Primo Shares

2007-06-19 Thread Ian Kelly
On 6/19/07, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: root and Eris have been offered shares by Murphy. According to the newly revised section 19 of the Primo Corporation charter, by accepting those shares (if they chose to do so) they become party to the Primo Corporation agreement. That's an

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Primo Shares

2007-06-19 Thread Ed Murphy
BobTHJ wrote: My interpretation was that since there is no time-limit for accepting shares that have been offered, the offer is still on the table. BobTHJ On 6/19/07, * Ian Kelly* [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 6/19/07, Roger Hicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]