On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Doesn't need to be Power>1 IMO.
I really hate having that kind of rule power-1. I still give credence
to the argument that conditional votes never worked because R2127's
definition of 'clearly specified' is unreasonable, and its power is
too lo
coppro wrote:
> comex wrote:
>> I submit the following Proposal (AI=3, II=0) and make it Distributable:
>> Boilerplate!
>> {
>> Create a new Power-3 rule reading:
>>
>> When an eligible voter on an Agoran decision attempts to cast
>> ballots without explicitly specifying the number of
comex wrote:
I submit the following Proposal (AI=3, II=0) and make it Distributable:
Boilerplate!
{
Create a new Power-3 rule reading:
When an eligible voter on an Agoran decision attempts to cast
ballots without explicitly specifying the number of ballots to
be cast (e.g. "FOR
3 matches
Mail list logo
