On 2020-06-28 11:21 p.m., Reuben Staley via agora-discussion wrote:
On 2020-06-28 13:54, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
Proposal: Decriminalization
(AI = 1.7)
Unless I'm missing something, this is purely a ruleset-wide change in
semantics from 'crime' to 'infraction', correct? Not
On 2020-06-28 13:54, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
Proposal: Decriminalization
(AI = 1.7)
Unless I'm missing something, this is purely a ruleset-wide change in
semantics from 'crime' to 'infraction', correct? Not an expansion to a
system where crimes and infractions are different
nch wrote:
On 6/28/20 2:54 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
Amend Rule 2626 (Certifiable Patches) by replacing "unless its sole
function is" with "unless e reasonably believes its sole function is".
[In addition to quibbles about "sole function", this also covers cases
like "I
On 6/28/20 2:54 PM, Edward Murphy via agora-business wrote:
> Amend Rule 2626 (Certifiable Patches) by replacing "unless its sole
> function is" with "unless e reasonably believes its sole function is".
>
> [In addition to quibbles about "sole function", this also covers cases
> like "I thought X
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:03 AM, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Proposal: Decriminalization
(AI = 2, please)
Create a rule titled Decriminalization with Power 2 and this text:
If a rule defines a method of breaching it as decriminalized, then
no person SHALL initiate a
5 matches
Mail list logo
