Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Noise reduction

2015-04-18 Thread Luis Ressel
On Sat, 18 Apr 2015 19:49:13 -0400 omd wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Luis Ressel wrote: > > his monthly report, whose values are the subsets of the set of > > eir! > Sorry, I tend to forget about that Spivak slang. I'm having a hard enough time trying not to switch back and

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Noise reduction

2015-04-18 Thread omd
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Luis Ressel wrote: > his monthly report, whose values are the subsets of the set of eir!

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Noise reduction

2015-04-17 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Luis Ressel wrote: > I retract my previous proposal "Noise reduction" and submit this one > instead: For further noise reduction, I was wondering about condensing this office with the equally-low traffic Herald (though Herald now has weekly duties too). aranea, would you be

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Noise reduction

2015-04-17 Thread Luis Ressel
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 09:35:55 -0600 Sprocklem wrote: > On 2015-04-17 09:07, Luis Ressel wrote: > > Amend Rule 2162 (Switches) by replacing the paragraph > > > >c) Optionally, exactly one office whose holder tracks > > instances of that switch. That officer's report includes the value > >

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Noise reduction

2015-04-17 Thread Sprocklem
On 2015-04-17 09:07, Luis Ressel wrote: > Amend Rule 2162 (Switches) by replacing the paragraph > >c) Optionally, exactly one office whose holder tracks instances > of that switch. That officer's report includes the value of > each instance of that switch whose value is