Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Paragraphs and pineapples

2007-02-28 Thread Taral
On 2/27/07, Ed Murphy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Even given that those M people might agree to create additional partnerships out of proper subsets, thus forming a bloc of 2^M-1 voters (including the natural persons)? Granted, this is Not Easy, either. Simpler -- don't give Partnerships any

DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Paragraphs and pineapples

2007-02-27 Thread Kerim Aydin
Murphy wrote: Upon the adoption of this proposal, each natural person who is part of a player that is not a natural person is awarded the Patent Title of Denny Crane. I object to this being treated as a cheap scam (whose perpetrators could be bought off with trinkets) rather than as a

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposal: Paragraphs and pineapples

2007-02-27 Thread Ed Murphy
Goethe wrote: How about something more radical and simple? Leave persons as referring to all types of persons (not just natural), but insert a single sentence persons consisting of the same set of natural persons are the same person. This would limit the arbitrary issue, and puts partnerships