comex wrote:
asset creation and destruction have the same weight? What if widgets
are a class of position cards and a rule (over which R1551 takes
precedence) says they can't be created?
This one at least, is clear. R1551 takes precedence.
-coppro
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
[If e.g. a report saying X has either Y or Z widgets is ratified, then
if X had Y widgets, then e still does; if X had Z widgets, then e still
does; if X had neither Y nor Z widgets, then that needs to be sorted out
by
c. wrote:
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
[If e.g. a report saying X has either Y or Z widgets is ratified, then
if X had Y widgets, then e still does; if X had Z widgets, then e still
does; if X had neither Y nor Z widgets, then that needs to be
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:37 PM, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Again, these are arguably problems with the current version of the
rule as well. It might well be better to specify that any portion of
the gamestate disclaimered in the document doesn't change.
I would vote for this--
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:21 PM, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
comex wrote:
asset creation and destruction have the same weight? What if widgets
are a class of position cards and a rule (over which R1551 takes
precedence) says they can't be created?
This one at least, is clear. R1551
5 matches
Mail list logo
