On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 20:37 -0500, Fool wrote:
> Hmmm... I'm pretty sure he meant to repeal all the rules. We can go
> ahead and figure this out without knowing what the end state is, no? We
> should be able to come up with a generic way to replace the ruleset with
> some "bootstrap" rule that r
On 2014-01-02 5:44 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
With a change of this magnitude, maybe you could post a proto-
ruleset of where you hope things would end up (including what
rules remain), then we could see if it makes logical sense as a
whole, and figure out the technicality of getting there - perhaps
On Thu, 2 Jan 2014, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> Rule 106: Adopting Proposals
I think, that the instant this one goes through, the proposal
loses power and the rule changes after it stop (I could be
wrong though). You actually might get into trouble even earlier,
as for a while precedence bet
On Thu, 2014-01-02 at 16:20 -0500, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> Repeal the following rules:
> Rule 104: First Speaker
I see an obvious problem here.
--
ais523
4 matches
Mail list logo