G. wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Henri Bouchard wrote:
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
wrote:
P.S: Oh, and AGAINST, by the way. I don't see why that would be
needed. All it does is getting rid of Yet Another Fun, Quirky Thing
From Agora, and unless I've missed some conver
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
> wrote:
> >
> > P.S: Oh, and AGAINST, by the way. I don't see why that would be
> > needed. All it does is getting rid of Yet Another Fun, Quirky Thing
> > From Agora, and unless I've missed some c
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
wrote:
>
> P.S: Oh, and AGAINST, by the way. I don't see why that would be
> needed. All it does is getting rid of Yet Another Fun, Quirky Thing
> From Agora, and unless I've missed some conversation somewhere, I
> didn't see any justification f
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Jonathan Rouillard
wrote:
> P.S: Oh, and AGAINST, by the way. I don't see why that would be
> needed. All it does is getting rid of Yet Another Fun, Quirky Thing
> From Agora, and unless I've missed some conversation somewhere, I
> didn't see any justification for
On Wed, 11 Jun 2014, Jonathan Rouillard wrote:
> P.S: Oh, and AGAINST, by the way. I don't see why that would be
> needed. All it does is getting rid of Yet Another Fun, Quirky Thing
> From Agora, and unless I've missed some conversation somewhere, I
> didn't see any justification for it.
The
On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Henri Bouchard wrote:
> Replace all instances of the phrase "Interstellar Associate
> Director of Personnel" in the Ruleset with the phrase, "Director
> of Personnel".
> Remove the following section from Rule 2138 (The Interstellar
> Associate Director
6 matches
Mail list logo
