Is there a judgment on whether a proposal can have an adoption index of
"none"? The one CFJ I can think of was on elections, nothing to do with
proposals. G. initiated a proposal with AI="none". As far as I know,
nobody challenged that, and, if adopted, it would have some interesting
effects on
The current standing judgements AFAICT are "ain't broke - don't fix".
This relies on assuming "no AI" == "AI='none'" but two judges have
agreed with that reading.
On 7/1/2019 11:32 AM, Aris Merchant wrote:
I don’t think this is a great idea. It seems like a rather large addition
of rule text
I think it's good to prohibit "none" from being an AI for a proposal -
it makes it easier to reason about the rest of the Rules that touch
proposals, and it might make bugs less likely for later changes that
touch AIs - you don't have to think about proposals having an AI of
"none" (even if an
I don’t think this is a great idea. It seems like a rather large addition
of rule text to fix one specific incidence of a larger problem.
-Aris
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 11:30 AM Jason Cobb wrote:
> I submit the following proposal:
>
>
> Title: Proposal AI fix
>
> Author: Jason Cobb
>
> AI: 3
>
>
4 matches
Mail list logo
