DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals 6834-41 are probably failing quorum due to succession weirdness

2010-09-17 Thread Keba
Geoffrey Spear wrote: If I haven't voted yet, I vote AGAINST each proposal from 6834-6841; without a recent referee's report I can't be bothered to figure out who's on my team, and I'm not voting FOR an interested proposal by a non-team-member as a protest against our Honored Speaker messing

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals 6834-41 are probably failing quorum due to succession weirdness

2010-09-17 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote: An invasion consisting of one player? (Or miss I someone?) Did I do anything wrong to deal me out? One player? Blognomic's Riddler took direct action to make you the Speaker; this conspiracy touches the highest levels of both BN and

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals 6834-41 are probably failing quorum due to succession weirdness

2010-09-17 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote: An invasion consisting of one player? (Or miss I someone?) Did I do anything wrong to deal me out? One player? Blognomic's Riddler took direct action to make you the Speaker; this conspiracy touches the highest

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proposals 6834-41 are probably failing quorum due to succession weirdness

2010-09-17 Thread Keba
Am Freitag, den 17.09.2010, 10:13 -0400 schrieb Geoffrey Spear: On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 9:53 AM, Keba ag...@kebay.org wrote: An invasion consisting of one player? (Or miss I someone?) Did I do anything wrong to deal me out? One player? Blognomic's Riddler took direct action to make you