On Jun 7, 2007, at 4:20 AM, Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
The Registrar's report shall include the following:
...
c) Whether each player is active or inactive, and the date on
which eir status last changed.
I dislike this. I think the reporting requirement for activity
should go
where activity is defined, in rule 2130, as it currently is. This
is more
maintainable than what you propose. I'd support moving some reporting
bits out of rule 2139: the fora list reporting part belongs in rule
478.
The reporting of the current set of players and registration dates
doesn't seem to have anywhere else to go, though: I think that's the
basic job of the registrar, and so can sensibly stay in rule 2139.
Just for clarity, when was activity initialized (in its current form)?
-----
Benjamin Schultz KE3OM
Registrar OscarMeyr
