Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Knuts!

2007-06-14 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: > v2 "Regulated actions cannot be performed except as specified by the > rules." (With the interpretation that "a player can X if Y" > counts as regulation of doing X in general, thus a player cannot > X unless Y.) > > v3 "Players don't have the right to perform r

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Knuts!

2007-06-13 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: The Gnome is responsible for keeping track of Wheezes. The Gnome's report includes Wheeze holdings. Frequency of report? As root pointed out, Rule 2143 has a default clause, I'm using it. In fact, as one would expect, the only offices that specify

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Knuts!

2007-06-13 Thread Ian Kelly
On 6/13/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: > The Gnome is responsible for keeping track of Wheezes. The > Gnome's report includes Wheeze holdings. Frequency of report? R2143: Any information designated to be part of the officer's report

DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Knuts!

2007-06-13 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: > The Gnome is responsible for keeping track of Wheezes. The > Gnome's report includes Wheeze holdings. Frequency of report? > Wheezes may be purchased according to the terms of an Agoran > contract called the Wheeze Catalog. I still think the Catalog should

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Knuts!

2007-06-01 Thread quazie
Zefram wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: When did we lose the "random selections are made by the Speaker by default" clause? Rule 1079, repealed 27 August 2006. I don't recall it ever coming into play; in my earlier era all random selections were explicitly assigned to someone.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Knuts!

2007-06-01 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: >When did we lose the "random selections are made by the Speaker >by default" clause? Rule 1079, repealed 27 August 2006. I don't recall it ever coming into play; in my earlier era all random selections were explicitly assigned to someone. >>>

DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Knuts!

2007-06-01 Thread Ian Kelly
On 6/1/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Proto-Proposal: Knuts! I like it. But I don't think a proposal this short should be creating two offices; couldn't the Gnome and the Shopkeepor be the same office? -root

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Knuts!

2007-06-01 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: Ed Murphy wrote: When a player registers, e receives a random number of Knuts from 1679 to 1974 (inclusive). Upon the adoption of this proposal, each player receives a random number of Knuts from 1679 to 1974 (inclusive). These should specify who makes the random sele

DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Knuts!

2007-06-01 Thread Zefram
Ed Murphy wrote: > When a player registers, e receives a random number of Knuts > from 1679 to 1974 (inclusive). > >Upon the adoption of this proposal, each player receives a random >number of Knuts from 1679 to 1974 (inclusive). These should specify who makes the random selection. How