DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Faster support

2008-04-28 Thread Ian Kelly
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > (b) either the performer was the initiator, or the performer has > supported the action and the rule allowing the action to be > performed dependently does not explicitly prohibit supporters >

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Faster support

2008-04-28 Thread Ed Murphy
root wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 12:28 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> (b) either the performer was the initiator, or the performer has >> supported the action and the rule allowing the action to be >> performed dependently does not explicitly prohibit su

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Proto: Faster support

2008-04-28 Thread Ian Kelly
On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 2:16 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On an unrelated note, R2138(c) needs to be fixed to match the new R2154. While you're at it, the middle third of the last sentence of R2127 could be removed. -root