On 7/23/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Upon the adoption of this proposal, Zefram incurs a requirement
to publish a sonnet within three minutes after the adoption of
this proposal.
That's a bit harsh isn't it? I mean I would give em 5 minutes at least
BobTHJ
Ed Murphy wrote:
>Proto-Proposal: Why not to repeal Rule 1795
R1795 wouldn't do much to stop you if you wanted to do that. My favoured
arrangement is that proposals should not be able to impose obligations
directly (no more than they can create legal fictions), so if you wanted
to impose a sonne
BobTHJ wrote:
On 7/23/07, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Upon the adoption of this proposal, Zefram incurs a requirement
to publish a sonnet within three minutes after the adoption of
this proposal.
That's a bit harsh isn't it? I mean I would give em 5 minutes at least
Judge Lind
Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Proto-Proposal: Why not to repeal Rule 1795
R1795 wouldn't do much to stop you if you wanted to do that. My favoured
arrangement is that proposals should not be able to impose obligations
directly (no more than they can create legal fictions), so if you wanted
4 matches
Mail list logo