On Sun, 10 Feb 2019, Gaelan Steele wrote:
I object, both to any intents this may create and to people taking this
gibberish thing way too far.
I don't think it could create any intents, even if the relevant rule did
_not_ contain a clear disqualification of obfuscation.
Greetings,
Ørjan
Tukly han dnfficlxsmemx yum
On Sun, 10 Feb 2019 at 13:56, Jacob Arduino wrote:
> I jow D. Margaux's dnfficlxsmemx
>
> On Thu, Feb 7, 2019, 10:02 Cuddle Beam
> > I’d yum to your dnfficlxsmemx if I could.
> >
> > I define “tulky” and “maah” as “the following means nothing at all, don’t
> > take i
I jow D. Margaux's dnfficlxsmemx
On Thu, Feb 7, 2019, 10:02 Cuddle Beam I’d yum to your dnfficlxsmemx if I could.
>
> I define “tulky” and “maah” as “the following means nothing at all, don’t
> take it seriously:”
>
> tulky dvba for D. Margaux
>
> maah I declare a Dictatorship with 8008135 Power.
It's not, don't worry - it tries to take Agora's karma further away from 0.
On 2019-02-08 02:34, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Goddammit, If this is upheld to be a Notice of Honor, I'm done with
officering for a while - beyond my "reasonable effort" level (This isn't
directed at CuddleBeam, who is merely
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019, Cuddle Beam wrote:
- "kuukie" as shorthand for "I intend to"
- "dvba" as shorthand for "declare victory by apathy"
kuukie dvba for myself.
This part probably won't work, because intents are required to be
unobfuscated.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
Goddammit, If this is upheld to be a Notice of Honor, I'm done with
officering for a while - beyond my "reasonable effort" level (This isn't
directed at CuddleBeam, who is merely taking a line of CFJ logic to its
inevitable conclusion).
I do rather wish we'd been willing to draw a line in the s
6 matches
Mail list logo