root wrote:
On Nov 19, 2007 10:35 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Monday 19 November 2007 17:48:08 you wrote:
With *Agoran Consent*, I intend to have Agora join B Nomic as a faction.
SUPPORT
We have 2 for, 1 against, and 1 against but not to the public forum.
I recommend t
On Nov 24, 2007 3:35 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Murphy: SUPPORT
> pikhq: SUPPORT
> Zefram: SUPPORT
> comex: SUPPORT
> BobTHJ: SUPPORT
> OscarMeyr: SUPPORT
>
>
> Taral: OBJECT
> Goethe: OBJECT
> Wooble: OBJECT
> Levi: OBJECT
>
> The following votes were not counted:
> Fookiemy
On Nov 20, 2007 11:10 AM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > OBJECT. I don't want to have to follow events in B Nomic in order to
> > play Agora.
>
> I don't think you would have to. Also, a summary of foreign events
> related to Agora could be added (either legislatively or voluntarily)
>
On 11/20/07, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What happens if the B Nomic rules are amended such that factions are
> bound by the B Nomic rules?
Why isn't Agora allowed to lie?
That rule change wouldn't make any sense because Agora would have
never agreed to be bound. But what if it did ag
Ian Kelly wrote:
>What happens if the B Nomic rules are amended such that factions are
>bound by the B Nomic rules?
Agora would morally have the option to cease being a B faction rather than
become bound by B rules. For B to attempt to bind Agora without giving
it such an option would be patently
5 matches
Mail list logo
