2009/9/25 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Roger Hicks wrote:
I act on behalf of Tiger to publish the following:
I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2215, a power-1 rule, by
having made a public statement on a matter relevant to the rules (that e
acts on behalf of Tiger) without
Tiger wrote:
2009/9/25 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Roger Hicks wrote:
I act on behalf of Tiger to publish the following:
I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2215, a power-1 rule, by
having made a public statement on a matter relevant to the rules (that e
acts on behalf of
Sean Hunt wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
I act on behalf of Tiger to publish the following:
I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2215, a power-1
rule, by having made a public statement on a matter relevant to the
rules (that e acts on behalf of Tiger) without a reasonable belief
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 14:40, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
I act on behalf of Tiger to publish the following:
I publish an NoV alleging that BobTHJ violated Rule 2215, a power-1 rule,
by having made a public statement on a matter relevant to the
BobTHJ wrote:
How does this not satisfy R2263(a)? Note the clauses of R2263 are ORed.
Also note R2263(c) doesn't require specifying which public contract
is enabling the action (though it's certainly a good idea to minimize
disputes).
5 matches
Mail list logo