On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, ais523 wrote:
> (there's no longer a requirement for offices to report
> on when their reports were last ratified; maybe we should add it back,
> because it was useful).
Also, "ratification date" would report the date that the report was published.
E.g. ratifying the 15-
On Fri, 23 Sep 2016, ais523 wrote:
> first! This requires "I X and Y" to not be equivalent to "I X, then Y",
> but the two have a different meaning in logic, and possibly a different
> meaning in standard English. (Note that in "I support and do so", the
> support definitely has to come first, s
On Thu, 2016-09-22 at 10:40 -0700, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > Um. New guy here. Sorry, but I'm a bit confused. If I'm getting this right
> > you're objecting...
> > To something you proposed? That doesn't sound right. I think I'm getting
> > confused?
> >
This is fun, but very complicated. I guess that's why it's fun though.
-Aris
On Sep 22, 2016 10:41 AM, "Kerim Aydin" > wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Aris Merchant wrote:
> > Um. New guy here. Sorry, but I'm a bit confused. If I'm getting this
> right you're objecting...
> > To something y
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, Aris Merchant wrote:
> Um. New guy here. Sorry, but I'm a bit confused. If I'm getting this right
> you're objecting...
> To something you proposed? That doesn't sound right. I think I'm getting
> confused?
> Or what are you doing? And what doses the "do so mean"? I'm so
Um. New guy here. Sorry, but I'm a bit confused. If I'm getting this right
you're objecting... To something you proposed? That doesn't sound right. I
think I'm getting confused? Or what are you doing? And what doses the "do
so mean"? I'm sorry, I'm probably making some error here.
-Aris
On Wednes
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, ais523 wrote:
> Thus, the only other option would be a manual
> ratification. There was an intent to ratify the list of Patent Titles
> on 22 August 2016 (as a response to the problem that this CFJ
> mentioned), but as far as I can tell it was never acted upon. As such,
> the
7 matches
Mail list logo