I agree with Ørjan, "a clear designation of intent" clearly only
applies to emails sent to all players, and you misquoted it. It's
"clear designation of intent TO BE PUBLIC".
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 2:09 PM, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
>> While the rules do not specifically
While the rules do not specifically define “an announcement of intent”,
rule 478 (“Fora”) defines what it means to announce something:
A public message is a message sent via a public forum, or sent to all
players and containing a clear designation of intent to be public. A
rule can also
afterthought, which was why it was in a
>> separate email. I did the win attempt, then realized I had a scam that I
>> could use to get a black ribbon, so I did so.
>
> Thanks for the explanation.
>
> By the way, your spam filter is leaking:
>
>> Subject: Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3572
>> assigned to o
>
> -o
>
planation.
By the way, your spam filter is leaking:
> Subject: Re: ***UNCHECKED*** Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Arbitor] CFJ 3572
> assigned to o
-o
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
Mostly a happy accident, I guess. I don’t think there’s much of a benefit to
sneakily doing other actions; I guess if I had a grudge against G. I could make
a sneaky CFJ then go “HAHAHAHA YOU FAILED TO ASSIGN,” but even that doesn’t
directly benefit me (I guess if he ended up with a red card
> On Oct 11, 2017, at 1:43 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> That was quite the emotional roller coaster, though I’ll admit I’m not that
> surprised. On the bright side, we’ve got a precedent for this sort of issues,
> and I’m not cardable for incorrect ratification.
Since
That was quite the emotional roller coaster, though I’ll admit I’m not that
surprised. On the bright side, we’ve got a precedent for this sort of issues,
and I’m not cardable for incorrect ratification.
Gaelan
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 9:05 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote:
>
> On Sun,
7 matches
Mail list logo