DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7965-7972

2017-11-21 Thread Ørjan Johansen
On Wed, 22 Nov 2017, VJ Rada wrote: immediately after". And participation favours are misspelled, so I believe they are unawardable at this time. I don't believe Agora cares about trivial spelling errors. (May also apply to Trigon's Æther comment.) Greetings, Ørjan.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7965-7972

2017-11-21 Thread VJ Rada
Oh fair fair point actually, yeah. The question then becomes: did you break that rule. Yeah, retract that CFJ. On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:57 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: > I can through the "The following officers CAN by announcement award Favours > in the listed Parties" at the b

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7965-7972

2017-11-21 Thread Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
I can through the "The following officers CAN by announcement award Favours in the listed Parties" at the beginning of the rule. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Nov 21, 2017, at 8:48 PM, VJ Rada wrote: > > I note two things. > > 1: It's a pervers

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Assessor] Resolution of Proposals 7965-7972

2017-11-21 Thread VJ Rada
You might want to do each seperately, as they are seperate issues. On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 12:55 PM, ATMunn wrote: > I AP CFJ on the following statement: > > In the below quoted message, PSS awarded favours. > > > On 11/21/2017 8:41 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote: >> >> I give 2 partic