On 7/2/08, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
>
> I'm obligating myself to give everyone who has not participated in the
> fora since April 29 a D note. This is equivalent to giving everyone a
> D note and then penalizing people D notes for participating in the
> fora. However, by rule 101,
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 1:58 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm obligating myself to give everyone who has not participated in the
> fora since April 29 a D note. This is equivalent to giving everyone a
> D note and then penalizing people D notes for participating in the
> fora.
No, because
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 3:58 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm obligating myself to give everyone who has not participated in the
> fora since April 29 a D note. This is equivalent to giving everyone a
> D note and then penalizing people D notes for participating in the
> fora. However, by
On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 6:15 AM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 10:57 PM, Charles Reiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Assuming reasonable participation, the net effect in this case is very
>> similar to taking five points (per week) away from everyone who does
>> excersize
On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 8:50 PM, ihope <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 5:15 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> == CFJ 2032 ==
>>
>>The hypothetical contract in the evidence section, if made a
>>contest, wo
5 matches
Mail list logo
