comex wrote:
> I CFJ on the statement: ais523 CAN win the game by announcement.
You CFJed twice on this statement. Would you like to retract one?
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:57 AM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> 2009/4/27 Geoffrey Spear :
>> It's a paradox. Of course it's not "sensical".
>
> It is not a paradox - merely something unexpected caused by the
> allowance of self-reference.
The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy disagrees with you:
"Cu
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-04-27 at 11:37 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Elliott Hird
>> wrote:
>>> 2009/4/27 Geoffrey Spear :
I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement. The statement of
the CFJ is nonsensical, and
2009/4/27 Geoffrey Spear :
> It's a paradox. Of course it's not "sensical".
It is not a paradox - merely something unexpected caused by the
allowance of self-reference.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:26 AM, Elliott Hird
wrote:
> 2009/4/27 Geoffrey Spear :
>> I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement. The statement of
>> the CFJ is nonsensical, and thus UNDETERMINED is the only appropriate
>> judgement.
>
> Please do not clutch at straws. It is perfectly sen
2009/4/27 comex :
> I CFJ on the statement: ais523 CAN win the game by announcement.
What, again?
2009/4/27 Geoffrey Spear :
> I intend, with 2 support, to appeal this judgement. The statement of
> the CFJ is nonsensical, and thus UNDETERMINED is the only appropriate
> judgement.
Please do not clutch at straws. It is perfectly sensical.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Curry's_paradox
7 matches
Mail list logo
