On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 17:07, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:00, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2682
== CFJ 2682 ==
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 17:18 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
If you'd like you can insert in the judges opinion after the
correct choice, because that is what matters here. Judges have
latitude to select what they believe to be the best option when faced
with multiple equally-plausible
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 17:23, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 17:18 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
If you'd like you can insert in the judges opinion after the
correct choice, because that is what matters here. Judges have
latitude to select what they believe to be
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 17:34 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
You seem to be missing the point here. This is not a matter of what is
true and what is false. In this case, because of the way the rule is
worded, there are two possible ways to interpret the rule. Both are
equally viable ways to interpret
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 17:40, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 17:34 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
You seem to be missing the point here. This is not a matter of what is
true and what is false. In this case, because of the way the rule is
worded, there are two
ais523 wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 17:34 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
You seem to be missing the point here. This is not a matter of what is
true and what is false. In this case, because of the way the rule is
worded, there are two possible ways to interpret the rule. Both are
equally viable
Sean Hunt wrote:
Roger Hicks wrote:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:00, Ed Murphy emurph...@socal.rr.com wrote:
Detail: http://zenith.homelinux.net/cotc/viewcase.php?cfj=2682
== CFJ 2682 ==
It is POSSIBLE to increase a player's voting
On Sat, 19 Sep 2009, ais523 wrote:
On Fri, 2009-09-18 at 17:18 -0600, Roger Hicks wrote:
If you'd like you can insert in the judges opinion after the
correct choice, because that is what matters here. Judges have
latitude to select what they believe to be the best option when faced
with
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009, Pavitra wrote:
However, I strongly disagree with that syllogism. Such a precedent would
allow low-powered rules to effectively override high-powered ones, by
pretending to avoid conflict while subverting the natural meaning of the
high-powered rule entirely.
I think of
9 matches
Mail list logo
