On Sun, Jan 31, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Sean Hunt <ride...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/30/2010 11:06 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: >> >> I intend, with two support, to appeal this judgment. Judge Yally failed >> to consider the long-standing precedent (see, for instance, CFJ 2120) of >> an obligation implying a mechanism. >> >> -coppro > > It has been pointed out to me that I misread Yally's arguments and that my > argument is invalid. I will still continue with the intent to appeal, > however, as Yally has a) failed to describe which, if any, of the > circumstances described in Murphy's argument are true b) incorrectly > referred to awarding Murphy points, when that was not a subject of the CFJ > c) assuming he referred to Murphy awarding me points in his second > paragraph, his arguments are contradictory, as he says that Murphy CANNOT > award me points, but would be GUILTY of a crime if e did not. > > -coppro >
Ah. Of course I meant to say that about failing to award coppro points, not Murphy.
