Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3320 assigned to omd

2013-05-13 Thread comexk
Well, I thought the sentence was pretty minor (more so than APOLOGY), but that's subjective. Feel free to appeal. Sent from my iPhone On May 12, 2013, at 9:26 PM, Tanner Swett swe...@mail.gvsu.edu wrote: On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:13 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: I assume the defendant

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3320 assigned to omd

2013-05-13 Thread omd
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 1:49 PM, woggle woggl...@gmail.com wrote: I hereby appeal this judgment. Arguments: The message was eventually delivered. Per CFJ 1646 and CFJ 2058, it was sent when it left my technical domain of control, which was before the deadline. Even if this precedent does not

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [CotC] CFJ 3320 assigned to omd

2013-05-12 Thread Tanner Swett
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 8:13 PM, omd c.ome...@gmail.com wrote: I assume the defendant received the bounce message immediately after attempting to post the ruleset, so e could have reasonably avoided breaking the rule by various methods, such as splitting the ruleset into parts or possibly