Sgeo wrote:
>> I also recommend the following for termination:
>> needed_support--
>> copy of needed_support--
>> Looping
>> but not Z House, which can still be used for appeals.
>>
> Why should those be terminated?
Because initiating a criminal case no longer requires support.
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Ed Murphy wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>> I intend, without objection, to terminate (2008-12-02 Warrigal #2),
>> quoted below:
>>
>>> I publicly pledge that if I get elected, I'll sort this out so that
>>> harblcat, Siege and Charles get an equal chance.
>>
>> I intend, wit
I wrote:
> I intend, without objection, to terminate (2008-12-02 Warrigal #2),
> quoted below:
>
>> I publicly pledge that if I get elected, I'll sort this out so that
>> harblcat, Siege and Charles get an equal chance.
>
> I intend, without objection, to terminate The Zombie of The List,
> quot
On Mon, Dec 15, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> If anyone thinks it worthwhile to maintain The List for the sole
> purpose of zombifying my votes, and is willing to publish The List
> weekly and encourage its use, I'd pay a salary of the right to spend
> some of my notes on my behalf. Prior
On Mon, 15 Dec 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 15 Dec 2008, at 15:23, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> I intend, without objection, to terminate The Zombie of The List,
>> quoted below:
>
> I object, Warrigal may be reelected.
If anyone thinks it worthwhile to maintain The List for the sole
purpose of zombif
On 15 Dec 2008, at 15:47, Ed Murphy wrote:
Why are you objecting to this one in particular? It depends on the
contract that Warrigal already terminated.
If Warrigal recreates it it will reactivate.
ehird wrote:
> On 15 Dec 2008, at 15:23, Ed Murphy wrote:
>
>> I intend, without objection, to terminate The Zombie of The List,
>> quoted below:
>
> I object, Warrigal may be reelected.
Why are you objecting to this one in particular? It depends on the
contract that Warrigal already terminate
7 matches
Mail list logo
