On 7 Aug 2013, at 01:26, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 20:24 -0400, Max Schutz wrote:
>> wait we have to re-register again
>
> Probably not. Wooble thinks we do, but I'm not sure if anyone else
> agrees with em.
>
> One common problem with nomic is that people disagree as to what th
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 20:24 -0400, Max Schutz wrote:
> wait we have to re-register again
Probably not. Wooble thinks we do, but I'm not sure if anyone else
agrees with em.
One common problem with nomic is that people disagree as to what the
state of things is.
--
ais523
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Max Schutz wrote:
> wait we have to re-register again
No.
Well, not unless Wooble.
wait we have to re-register again
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 20:14 -0400, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > I register.
>
> I also register, on the very remote chance that this actually does
> anything.
>
> --
> ais523
>
>
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:32 PM, omd wrote:
>> Can someone please give me a counterargument to "When created,
>> switches have their default values" == "new switches have their
>> default values"?
>
> Rule 1586.
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/agora-discussion@agoranomic.org/msg26317.html
Counter-
On 5 August 2013 21:35, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:32 PM, omd wrote:
>>> Can someone please give me a counterargument to "When created,
>>> switches have their default values" == "new switches have their
>>> default values"?
>>
>> Rule 1586.
>
> By the way, the rules didn't actually sa
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:32 PM, omd wrote:
>> Can someone please give me a counterargument to "When created,
>> switches have their default values" == "new switches have their
>> default values"?
>
> Rule 1586.
By the way, the rules didn't actually say "when created, switches have
their default v
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 5 August 2013 20:49, omd wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> An alternate viewpoint:
>>
>> CoE since ratification will probably be fixed in the next week: in the
>> normal universe, this is incorrect for o
On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:19 PM, Charles Walker
wrote:
> On 5 August 2013 20:49, omd wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>>> An alternate viewpoint:
>>
>> CoE since ratification will probably be fixed in the next week: in the
>> normal universe, this is incorrect for o
On 5 August 2013 20:49, omd wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:46 PM, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> An alternate viewpoint:
>
> CoE since ratification will probably be fixed in the next week: in the
> normal universe, this is incorrect for obvious reasons.
Can someone please give me a counterargument
10 matches
Mail list logo
