Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6377-6384

2009-06-24 Thread Alex Smith
On Wed, 2009-06-24 at 01:34 -0500, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: > > Aaron Goldfein wrote: > >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: > >>> Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Your voting limit is 8. > >>> Incorrect. > >>> > >> > >> Rule . > > Ru

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6377-6384

2009-06-24 Thread Geoffrey Spear
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 2:34 AM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Psssht. What's the point of even having Rule ? The prerogative is the only way to circumvent it; if you feel strongly about the WEV not getting > 8 votes, propose powering up (Power 2.222 should do nicely), or spend notes to decreas

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6377-6384

2009-06-23 Thread Paul VanKoughnett
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: >> Aaron Goldfein wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Your voting limit is 8. Incorrect. >>> >>> Rule . >> Rule 2019 tak

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6377-6384

2009-06-23 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:17 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: >>> Aaron Goldfein wrote: Your voting limit is 8. >>> Incorrect. >>> >> >> Rule . > Rule 2019 takes precedence. > Psssht. What's the point of even having Rule 222

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6377-6384

2009-06-23 Thread Sean Hunt
Aaron Goldfein wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: >> Aaron Goldfein wrote: >>> Your voting limit is 8. >> Incorrect. >> > > Rule . Rule 2019 takes precedence.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6377-6384

2009-06-23 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Wed, Jun 24, 2009 at 1:06 AM, Sean Hunt wrote: > Aaron Goldfein wrote: >> Your voting limit is 8. > Incorrect. > Rule .

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6377-6384

2009-06-23 Thread Sean Hunt
Aaron Goldfein wrote: > Your voting limit is 8. Incorrect.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6377-6384

2009-06-23 Thread Aaron Goldfein
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Sean Hunt wrote: > I vote as follows on each of these decisions: >> 6377 O 0 1.0 coppro              inflation > FOR x 12. > I intend, with support, to make this proposal Democratic. > >> 6378 D 1 3.0 Murphy              Changing votes > FOR > >> 6379 D 2 3.0 allis

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6377-6384

2009-06-23 Thread Ed Murphy
Yally wrote: > 6383 O 1 1.0 Murphy Clarify conditional votes > PRESENT * 3 [I'm not exactly sure what this proposal does other than > just reword what is already there.] It explicitly allows votes that depend on conditions with values other than true/false, e.g. "I vote for the first

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6377-6384

2009-06-23 Thread Ed Murphy
Wooble wrote: > I rubberstamp the decisions to adopt proposals 6277, 6380, 6381, and > 6383, to avoid ambiguity in the number of eligible voters to count > toward quorum from propagating further. Typo, surely you meant 6377.