On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:16, Geoffrey Speargeoffsp...@gmail.com wrote:
6467 D 0 2.0 BobTHJ Fix Hand Limit Defaults
AGAINST
Is there a reason why people are voting against this? it was a simple fix.
BobTHJ
coppro wrote:
6466 O 0 1.0 coppro Chaos Cleanup
FOR x 8
Your voting limit is 5.
Pavitra wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
6473 O 0 1.0 coppro That Was Easy
FOR x 8
I play On the Nod to rubberstamp this decision.
AGAINST x my voting limit (I think 1).
I have it at 2.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Sean Huntride...@gmail.com wrote:
comex wrote:
6473 O 0 1.0 coppro That Was Easy
ISELL(30zm - AGAINST)
I fill this offer/purchase it/make comex vote FOR on that proposal.
(This caused me to retract my AGAINST vote and vote FOR.)
--
-c.
Ed Murphy wrote:
Pavitra wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
6473 O 0 1.0 coppro That Was Easy
FOR x 8
I play On the Nod to rubberstamp this decision.
AGAINST x my voting limit (I think 1).
I have it at 2.
I was recently demoted to Epsilon.
Pavitra wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Pavitra wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
6473 O 0 1.0 coppro That Was Easy
FOR x 8
I play On the Nod to rubberstamp this decision.
AGAINST x my voting limit (I think 1).
I have it at 2.
I was recently demoted to Epsilon.
That was after the
Pavitra wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:
Pavitra wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
6473 O 0 1.0 coppro That Was Easy
FOR x 8
I play On the Nod to rubberstamp this decision.
AGAINST x my voting limit (I think 1).
I have it at 2.
I was recently demoted to Epsilon.
Voting limits are fixed at
2009/9/1 Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com:
Sean Hunt wrote:
6463 D 1 2.0 C-walker More Criminal Sentences v2
PRESENT; not enough guidance as to when sentences should be used for a
ISELL(25 zm)
-coppro
Eh?
8 matches
Mail list logo
