On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 11:16, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> 6467 D 0 2.0 BobTHJ Fix Hand Limit Defaults
> AGAINST
Is there a reason why people are voting against this? it was a simple fix.
BobTHJ
2009/9/1 Sean Hunt :
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> 6463 D 1 2.0 C-walker More Criminal Sentences v2
>> PRESENT; not enough guidance as to when sentences should be used for a
> ISELL(25 zm)
>
> -coppro
>
Eh?
Pavitra wrote:
> Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Pavitra wrote:
>>
>>> Sean Hunt wrote:
> 6473 O 0 1.0 coppro That Was Easy
FOR x 8
I play On the Nod to rubberstamp this decision.
>>> AGAINST x my voting limit (I think 1).
>> I have it at 2.
>>
> I was recently demoted to Epsilon.
Pavitra wrote:
> Ed Murphy wrote:
>> Pavitra wrote:
>>
>>> Sean Hunt wrote:
> 6473 O 0 1.0 coppro That Was Easy
FOR x 8
I play On the Nod to rubberstamp this decision.
>>> AGAINST x my voting limit (I think 1).
>> I have it at 2.
>>
> I was recently demoted to Epsilon.
Th
Ed Murphy wrote:
> Pavitra wrote:
>
>> Sean Hunt wrote:
6473 O 0 1.0 coppro That Was Easy
>>> FOR x 8
>>> I play On the Nod to rubberstamp this decision.
>>
>> AGAINST x my voting limit (I think 1).
>
> I have it at 2.
>
I was recently demoted to Epsilon.
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> comex wrote:
>>> 6473 O 0 1.0 coppro That Was Easy
>> ISELL(30zm - AGAINST)
> I fill this offer/purchase it/make comex vote FOR on that proposal.
(This caused me to retract my AGAINST vote and vote FOR.)
--
-c.
Pavitra wrote:
> Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> 6473 O 0 1.0 coppro That Was Easy
>> FOR x 8
>> I play On the Nod to rubberstamp this decision.
>
> AGAINST x my voting limit (I think 1).
I have it at 2.
coppro wrote:
>> 6466 O 0 1.0 coppro Chaos Cleanup
> FOR x 8
Your voting limit is 5.
8 matches
Mail list logo
