coppro wrote:
(note to the Assessor: I am fully aware my voting limit is not 12)
According to my records, your voting limit on ordinary proposals is 5.
BobTHJ wrote:
6476 O 1 1.0 Yally No More Paradox
PRESENT
Your voting limit on ordinary proposals is 0 due to rests.
BobTHJ wrote:
6476 O 1 1.0 Yally No More Paradox
PRESENT
Your voting limit on ordinary proposals is 0 due to rests.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 13:30, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 14:37 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
6486 D 1 2.0 BobTHJ Audit Cleanup
AGAINST; Laundering is just too utterly difficult to prove here.
Just because it may be difficult to prove doesn't
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 20:50 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal 6481 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Wooble
FOR if the PNP includes the text comex, AGAINST otherwise.
I'm not at all convinced that vote will resolve to anything but PRESENT.
--
ais523
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 22:00 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
I submit the following proposal and make it Distributable:
AI=2 II=0 MWoP Assumption Fix
{{
Ratify the following document: {Proposal 6478 passed.}
At power 2?
--
ais523
Pavitra wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal 6478 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Pavitra
AGAINST. This completely devalues MWoP and makes no effort to
destroy/replace it, and also doesn't deal with elections that cause a
candidate to be elected, but don't have an outcome because no Decision
7 matches
Mail list logo
