BobTHJ wrote:
>> 6476 O 1 1.0 Yally No More Paradox
> PRESENT
Your voting limit on ordinary proposals is 0 due to rests.
BobTHJ wrote:
>> 6476 O 1 1.0 Yally No More Paradox
> PRESENT
Your voting limit on ordinary proposals is 0 due to rests.
coppro wrote:
> (note to the Assessor: I am fully aware my voting limit is not 12)
According to my records, your voting limit on ordinary proposals is 5.
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 13:30, ais523 wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 14:37 -0400, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
>> 6486 D 1 2.0 BobTHJ Audit Cleanup
> AGAINST; Laundering is just too utterly difficult to prove here.
Just because it may be difficult to prove doesn't mean it shouldn't be
crimin
Pavitra wrote:
Sean Hunt wrote:
Proposal 6478 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Pavitra
AGAINST. This completely devalues MWoP and makes no effort to
destroy/replace it, and also doesn't deal with elections that cause a
candidate to be elected, but don't have an outcome because no Decision
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 22:00 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
> I submit the following proposal and make it Distributable:
> AI=2 II=0 "MWoP Assumption Fix"
> {{
> Ratify the following document: {Proposal 6478 passed.}
At power 2?
--
ais523
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 20:50 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > Proposal 6481 (Democratic, AI=2.0, Interest=1) by Wooble
> FOR if the PNP includes the text "comex", AGAINST otherwise.
I'm not at all convinced that vote will resolve to anything but PRESENT.
--
ais523
7 matches
Mail list logo
