DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6590-6599

2009-12-06 Thread Ed Murphy
c. wrote: > Note: My voting limit is probably 0. It is, you have 9 Rests and only 1 Extra Vote.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6590-6599

2009-12-03 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Thu, 3 Dec 2009, comex wrote: >> 6591  1   3.9  G.*               Green    power => mutability > AGAINST, but I'd support removing "with power below the power of this > rule" from R2140 Ok no worries. But for some weird reason I thought we discussed this when I submitted it and you (and othe

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: [Promotor] Distribution of Proposals 6590-6599

2009-12-03 Thread Aaron Goldfein
> > 6597 1 2.0 Yally Red We don't need this anymore >> > AGAINST. What a terrible idea > Well there are cards that accomplish the same thing. The "with two support" thing is an easy way to circumvent that.