On Tue, Oct 10, 2017, 21:58 Owen Jacobson, wrote:
>
> > 7920* Gaelan, Aris 1.0 The Lint Screen v2 Gaelan 1 sh.
>
> PRESENT. I suspect this is impractical, per Alexis’ overarching complaints
> about platonic outcomes from subjective judgements. A refund mechanism for
> linty prop
> On Oct 9, 2017, at 1:17 AM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> For the record, I’ve been re-wrapping rules as I touch them. Looking at the
> ruleset now, however, I’m not sure if I’ve been indenting to the right width…
>
> By the way: does anybody know of a markdown-aware automatic line wrapper?
> I’
Oh dear, I’ve been rewrapping to 76. Not sure how I miscounted that. I’ve fixed
my sublime settings; rules will fix themselves as I touch them. Some day if I’m
feeling particularly motivated I’ll go through and fix everything.
Gaelan
> On Oct 9, 2017, at 10:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
>
On Tue, 10 Oct 2017, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> On Sun, 8 Oct 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> > For the record, I’ve been re-wrapping rules as I touch them. Looking at the
> > ruleset now, however, I’m not sure if I’ve been indenting to the right
> > width…
>
> Well I'm not sure which ones you've f
On Sun, 8 Oct 2017, Gaelan Steele wrote:
For the record, I’ve been re-wrapping rules as I touch them. Looking at
the ruleset now, however, I’m not sure if I’ve been indenting to the
right width…
Well I'm not sure which ones you've fixed, so...
The standard used to be something like 75 chars,
Tacking prices onto everything is definitely one way to incentivize the
accumulation of wealth, but I'm not sure it's the best one.
--
Trigon
--
On Oct 9, 2017 3:38 PM, "VJ Rada" wrote:
Alexis is bang on. That's where I was going with "libertarian world"
bc in libertarian world you need
Alexis is bang on. That's where I was going with "libertarian world"
bc in libertarian world you need to spend cash to buy EVERYTHING.
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 8:36 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
> I don't believe I was around for the drafts, sorry.
>
> In any case, the problem with the economy isn't thin
I don't believe I was around for the drafts, sorry.
In any case, the problem with the economy isn't things like stocks and
debts, imo. It is that there is little benefit to accumulating wealth. That
needs fixing first in my opinion.
On Mon, Oct 9, 2017, 16:52 Publius Scribonius Scholasticus, <
p.
Given that I went through many rounds of drafting with this, I wish you
could have mentioned it. The problem that exists is the lack of the
ability to stimulate the economy with stocks or allow debt. This
resolves that by creating a mechanism for it.
On 10/09/2017 09:19 AM, Alexis Hunt wrote:
wrapping*
> On Oct 8, 2017, at 10:17 PM, Gaelan Steele wrote:
>
> indenting
For the record, I’ve been re-wrapping rules as I touch them. Looking at the
ruleset now, however, I’m not sure if I’ve been indenting to the right width…
By the way: does anybody know of a markdown-aware automatic line wrapper? I’ve
been using a combination of manual wrapping for lists and such
On Sun, 8 Oct 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> > 7920* Gaelan, Aris 1.0 The Lint Screen v2 Gaelan 1 sh.
> AGAINST. Not a fan, and I'm not voting for this when the biggest "error"
> continues to be breaking a 20+ year indentation format by the Rulekeepor.
I really meant to put a smil
12 matches
Mail list logo