On Wed, 3 Jul 2019 at 04:15, Ørjan Johansen wrote:
> Your proposal numbers have some off-by-100 errors.
Whoops! Revised votes below.
> >> IDAuthor(s) AITitle
> >> ---
> >> 8196 Jason Cobb, Falsifian 1.
Your proposal numbers have some off-by-100 errors.
Greetings,
Ørjan.
On Wed, 3 Jul 2019, James Cook wrote:
Votes inline.
IDAuthor(s) AITitle
---
8196 Jason Cobb, Falsifian 1.7 Perfecting pledges
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 2:55 PM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 11:08 AM Aris Merchant
> wrote:
> > As it is, we
> > have defaults that are either often broken (1.0 AI) or terribly bad
> > practice and as likely as not to annoy everyone (empty title). Making
> them
> > mandatory helps
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 11:08 AM Aris Merchant
wrote:
> As it is, we
> have defaults that are either often broken (1.0 AI) or terribly bad
> practice and as likely as not to annoy everyone (empty title). Making them
> mandatory helps everyone get it right, including new players.
It's mainly Title
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 11:08 AM Aris Merchant <
thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 11:00 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:57 AM Aris Merchant
>> wrote:
>> > > > 8201 Aris 3.0 Just Make Them Write It Out
>> > > AGAINST.
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 11:00 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:57 AM Aris Merchant
> wrote:
> > > > 8201 Aris 3.0 Just Make Them Write It Out
> > > AGAINST. The fix above (8200) does a better job at the fix.
> > >
> >
> > Please read the comment; this fixes a
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 9:57 AM Aris Merchant
wrote:
> > > 8201 Aris 3.0 Just Make Them Write It Out
> > AGAINST. The fix above (8200) does a better job at the fix.
> >
>
> Please read the comment; this fixes a different problem, not the same one.
I sympathize with the commen
On Tue, Jul 2, 2019 at 7:40 AM Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
> I vote as follows. I act on behalf of Telnaior to vote as follows.
>
>
> > IDAuthor(s) AITitle
> >
> ---
> > 8196 Jason Cobb, Falsifian 1.7 Perfe
Uh, doesn't distributing with an incorrect AI listed invalidate the
decision if the lack of correct essential parameter is noted?
(we just discussed that I think? Maybe I missed part of that.)
CoE: the Proposal Pool is not empty, it contains the proposal noted
below.
Also, in R107, the ancie
Just to be clear, my comments were not at all directed at you specifically,
just about the issue in general.
-Aris
On Mon, Jul 1, 2019 at 8:11 PM Jason Cobb wrote:
> Eh, I thought 8197 was taking advantage of a neat little bug. I'd also
> kind of like to see how R106 is interpreted with a non-n
10 matches
Mail list logo
