Wooble wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:08 PM, comex wrote:
>> For each proposal listed as being in the Pool, if it was removed from
>> the Pool, I submit a new proposal with its listed text, AI, II, and
>> title.
>
> Wouldn't bothering to have voted on the proposal that allowed this
> have be
On Tue, Dec 15, 2009 at 7:08 PM, comex wrote:
> For each proposal listed as being in the Pool, if it was removed from
> the Pool, I submit a new proposal with its listed text, AI, II, and
> title.
Wouldn't bothering to have voted on the proposal that allowed this
have been easier? Of course, if
On Apr 20, 2007, at 8:27 AM, Zefram wrote:
You've missed two proposals from me:
* "avoid precedence paradoxes and bugs too", submitted on 2007-04-08
and AI set to 3 on 2007-04-10
* "resurrect the Assessor", submitted on 2007-04-11
-zefram
Thanks for the correction. I'm not sure how I mis
3 matches
Mail list logo
