On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 9:27 AM, Roger Hicks pidge...@gmail.com wrote:
I believe at the time of this distribution my voting limit was 1 (2 by
caste, but I had 4 rests)
On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 20:13, Sean Hunt ride...@gmail.com wrote:
NUM II AI SUBMITTER TITLE
6533 0 1.0
BobTHJ wrote:
Nevermind, I only had 3 rests as of the time of this distrbution. For
And this is why copy+paste is dangerous, and also why voting results
self-ratifying is a Good Idea:
$q = // long but valid SQL
$q = query($q);
$ct = pg_fetch_object($q, 0);
$caste_then = $ct-caste_then;
if
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 1:48 PM, ais523 callforjudgem...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 20:13 -0600, Sean Hunt wrote:
6537 0 1.0 Walker R2215 Fix
PRESENT; what would this do?
Correct a grammar/ spelling mistake?
--
Charles Walker
coppro wrote:
6541 1 2.0 Murphy Flowers for Wooble
AGAINST. Should only apply to proposals in the Proposal Pool.
Ah, right, removing a proposal from the pool doesn't cause it to
cease being a proposal. (Why not? There's currently no mechanism
to put a removed proposal back
4 matches
Mail list logo
