DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5764-5764

2008-10-07 Thread ais523
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 11:31 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: 5764 O 1 1.0 ais523 That's enough for now AGAINST x 5. Private is not a legal value of the publicity switch, so this proposal does nothing. Oh dear, it should be Foreign, shouldn't it? Unfortunately I was in so much of a

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5764-5764

2008-10-07 Thread Ed Murphy
Zefram wrote: I hereby vote: 5764 O 1 1.0 ais523 That's enough for now FOR Can't, you're inactive.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5764-5764

2008-10-07 Thread ais523
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 11:37 -0700, Ed Murphy wrote: Zefram wrote: I hereby vote: 5764 O 1 1.0 ais523 That's enough for now FOR Can't, you're inactive. No e isn't, e reactivated emself in #really-a-cow. -- ais523

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5764-5764

2008-10-07 Thread ehird
On 7 Oct 2008, at 19:37, Ed Murphy wrote: Zefram wrote: I hereby vote: 5764 O 1 1.0 ais523 That's enough for now FOR Can't, you're inactive. Don't be so sure... -- ehird

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5764-5764

2008-10-07 Thread Ed Murphy
ais523 wrote: On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 11:31 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: 5764 O 1 1.0 ais523 That's enough for now AGAINST x 5. Private is not a legal value of the publicity switch, so this proposal does nothing. Oh dear, it should be Foreign, shouldn't it? Unfortunately I was in so

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5764-5764

2008-10-07 Thread Zefram
ehird wrote: Don't be so sure... Is that a threat to falsify your log? -zefram

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5764-5764

2008-10-07 Thread Zefram
ehird wrote: No... because you actually said that you came off hold. Yes, I did. I was mistaken about what you were saying don't be so sure about. Sorry. -zefram