DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-06 Thread Ian Kelly
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 11:43 AM, Alex Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: AGAINST, very much so. There are probably private pledges that existed decades ago which I've never seen, that were published, and never technically ended. This would force me to track them. Pledges have only existed since

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-05 Thread Elliott Hird
On 5 Nov 2008, at 12:34, Bayes wrote: Bayes votes as follows: 5837 O 1 1.0 Murphy The rules command you FOR*8 (60% sure) 5838 O 0 1.0 ais523 Reformed Bank of Agora FOR*8 (50% sure) -- bayes 2008-11-02 18:44:42 + why is it voting for everything --

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-05 Thread Ed Murphy
ehird wrote: On 5 Nov 2008, at 12:34, Bayes wrote: Bayes votes as follows: 5837 O 1 1.0 Murphy The rules command you FOR*8 (60% sure) 5838 O 0 1.0 ais523 Reformed Bank of Agora FOR*8 (50% sure) -- bayes 2008-11-02 18:44:42 + why is it voting for

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-05 Thread comex
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 10:22 AM, Elliott Hird [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: why is it voting for everything I just tweaked it a little based on what we discussed on IRC: Created commit 9b8f612: use *H* instead of spambayes' weird algorithm (SORRY EHIRD FOR COMMITTING AS BAYES) 1 files changed, 4

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-05 Thread Elliott Hird
On 5 Nov 2008, at 15:48, Ed Murphy wrote: Someone suggested in ##nomic (I think you were AFK) comex, I think. -- ehird

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-04 Thread Alex Smith
On Tue, 2008-11-04 at 15:28 -0700, Ian Kelly wrote: 5833 D 1 2.0 Murphy No involuntary recordkeepors FOR 5834 D 1 3.0 Goethe Powered defines v0.3 FOR 5835 D 1 2.0 Goethe pledge fixup FOR 5836 D 1 2.0 Murphy Generalize continuity FOR

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-04 Thread Kerim Aydin
On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Pavitra wrote: 5839 D 1 2.0 Goethe NOT GUILTY AGAINST. Agora is not the USA. Um, was thinking of British system actually which originated this. Dunno much about French etc., do they have all these gradations? I thought Guilty/not guilty was pretty universal.

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-04 Thread Ian Kelly
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 5:24 PM, Kerim Aydin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 4 Nov 2008, Pavitra wrote: 5839 D 1 2.0 Goethe NOT GUILTY AGAINST. Agora is not the USA. Um, was thinking of British system actually which originated this. Dunno much about French etc., do they have

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-04 Thread Ed Murphy
root wrote: 5836 D 1 2.0 Murphy Generalize continuity FOR 5838 O 0 1.0 ais523 Reformed Bank of Agora AGAINST x 2 no vote announcements are recommended (to guard against my possibly mis-entering votes), especially when voting on multiple batches at once.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Distribution of proposals 5833-5840

2008-11-04 Thread Ed Murphy
0x44 wrote: 5833 D 1 2.0 Murphy No involuntary recordkeepors SELL(2VP - F) * 2 5840 D 1 2.0 rootNo accounting of private assets SELL(2VP) * 2 Note that caste doesn't apply to democratic proposals. (How did I manage to forget about Support Democracy wrt