Dvorak Herring wrote:
Seeing as most if not all of these proposals will pass, I vote:
Proposal 5841: AGAINST
Ineffective, you already voted AGAINST.
Proposals 5842-5941: FOR
Ineffective, you already voted AGAINST (except 5859 where you already
voted FOR).
On 7 Nov 2008, at 02:23, Dvorak Herring wrote:
5859 O 3 1.0 P23 Points for Me
FOR
Hahahahahah
--
ehird
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 20:33:10 -0700
Ian Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I CFJ on the statement, The proposal submitted by root at or around
Wed, 5 Nov 2008 22:03:48 UTC has been distributed.
Arguments:
The proposal was submitted with this title:
{{{
2001
A Space
BobTHJ wrote:
On Proposals 5842 to 5941, I vote FOR x 8 if the proposal number is
divisible by at least three of the first five primes, otherwise
AGAINST x 8.
For convenience, the proposal numbers meeting the condition for FOR
are 5850, 5852, 5874, 5880, 5910, 5922, and 5940.
4 matches
Mail list logo
