On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 9:24 AM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> AGAINST (scammable)
>
> how?
Come now, the scam-master is asking *me* how to scam it?
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Please let me know if there's any further trouble I can give you."
-- Unknown
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 17:24:37 +
Elliott Hird <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 30 Nov 2008, at 16:41, Taral wrote:
>
> > AGAINST (scammable)
>
> how?
>
I just told my dog that I purported to ratify a document. (No, not really, but
that illustrates one of the problems.)
--
Elysion
On 30 Nov 2008, at 16:41, Taral wrote:
AGAINST (scammable)
how?
Murphy wrote:
> Again, bring back Infractions. (Yes, ais523's proto, but that brings
> up another issue that was observed several years back: one way to
> delay progress in a given area is to float a proto and then fail to
> submit it as a proposal.)
Sorry, I've been busy recently. Someone else f
comex wrote:
> Because it means that SHALLs are ignored. Since the with 2 support
> requirement was added, in several months, only three people have been
> found GUILTY of anything, one of which was a partnership: out of
> these, only ehird was actually punished (for Phill). Each of the
> other
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 2. When you break a SHALL, you take a risk. Half the time you'd get
>> off with an Excused anyway because it was accidental. Why would anyone
>> be wanting to support criminality, unle
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. When you break a SHALL, you take a risk. Half the time you'd get
> off with an Excused anyway because it was accidental. Why would anyone
> be wanting to support criminality, unless they had an axe to grind?
Because it
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> 3. The instant-reflexive CFJ was just being used when two people were
>> annoyed at each other. If this passes I shall prove my point. I believe
>> I have 5 CFJs permitted per week? A
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 2:57 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 3. The instant-reflexive CFJ was just being used when two people were
> annoyed at each other. If this passes I shall prove my point. I believe
> I have 5 CFJs permitted per week? And I won't need support to call criminal
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 25 Nov 2008, at 19:37, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>> So, if a crime is low priority enough that you can't find two supporters,
>> why clog the courts with a CFJ process?
>
> Yay the rules are irrelevant!! Let's use telepathy to determine everyone's
> intenti
On 25 Nov 2008, at 19:37, Kerim Aydin wrote:
So, if a crime is low priority enough that you can't find two
supporters,
why clog the courts with a CFJ process?
Yay the rules are irrelevant!! Let's use telepathy to determine
everyone's
intentions? Wait, we have that, it's called equity...
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I must live in an alternate universe where some players "play the game"
>> by not even paying attention to cases going on around them. Oh, wait...
>> damn.
>
> Whereas the rest
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 1:21 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I must live in an alternate universe where some players "play the game"
> by not even paying attention to cases going on around them. Oh, wait...
> damn.
Whereas the rest of us live in an alternate universe where players
bl
On Tue, 25 Nov 2008, Elliott Hird wrote:
> On 25 Nov 2008, at 17:54, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>> Good plan, follow up every criminal cfj with another CFJ against
>> the caller, then of course another against *that* caller.
>
> You must live in a weird alternate universe where this happened all the
> t
On 25 Nov 2008, at 17:54, Kerim Aydin wrote:
Good plan, follow up every criminal cfj with another CFJ against
the caller, then of course another against *that* caller.
You must live in a weird alternate universe where this happened all the
time in the past.
15 matches
Mail list logo
