DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections

snail wrote: I vote as follows in the prime minister election: [snail] This vote was ineffective, as voting was not yet open.

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections.

reminder that there's also an election for regkeepor, with only 1 vote on it (and PSS's VP=0 vote). also fact: if the elections were resolved now, G would be the herald, I would be the PM, o. would be the ADoP, and 天火狐 would be the reportor. On Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Owen Jacobson

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections.

I know, it is more a meaningful vote that an actually effective vote. Publius Scribonius Scholasticus p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com > On Sep 7, 2017, at 2:35 AM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > > >> On Sep 6, 2017, at 8:46 PM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus >>

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections.

"I vote for whoever has the most votes for each currently open office election" FYI I'm not resolving this. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 4:02 PM, V.J Rada wrote: > I announce that I am a candidate for Prime Minister and ADoP. Y'all > should vote for me, folks. > > On Thu, Sep 7,

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections.

I announce that I am a candidate for Prime Minister and ADoP. Y'all should vote for me, folks. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Owen Jacobson wrote: > >> On Sep 6, 2017, at 2:51 AM, V.J Rada wrote: >> >> As the ADoP, I initiate elections for the positions of

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections.

On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote: > On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 03:15 +0200, Cuddle Beam wrote: > > Hrm. This is interesting. (If they're different) Would the verdict be what > > I intended the message to mean or the consensus on the interpretation of > > what I've written? > > It'd be pretty bad

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections.

On Thu, 2017-09-07 at 03:15 +0200, Cuddle Beam wrote: > Hrm. This is interesting. (If they're different) Would the verdict be what > I intended the message to mean or the consensus on the interpretation of > what I've written? It'd be pretty bad for the game if a person's actual intentions (which

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections.

Hrm. This is interesting. (If they're different) Would the verdict be what I intended the message to mean or the consensus on the interpretation of what I've written? On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 3:07 AM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > It's unclear to me if this is a statement of

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections.

It's unclear to me if this is a statement of fact (whomever has the most votes *now*) or a conditional vote (whomever has the most votes at the end of the voting period). If I had to guess, I'd go with the first one. On Thu, 7 Sep 2017, Cuddle Beam wrote: > I vote for whoever has the most

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections.

Could work as a good place for ads too. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:03 AM, Josh T wrote: > I intend to also make news sections freelance-able, to be included if > deemed worthy and author paid if used. Should I win and contracts pass, I > intend to make a contract which

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections.

I intend to also make news sections freelance-able, to be included if deemed worthy and author paid if used. Should I win and contracts pass, I intend to make a contract which allows me to pay people for articles if they wish to submit them and I choose to include them. Please find a

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: Initiating elections.

you can take reportor On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 5:02 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > > On Wed, 6 Sep 2017, V.J Rada wrote: >> As the ADoP, I initiate elections for the positions of Prime Minister, >> Herald, ADoP. and Reportor. >> >> I initiate the Agoran decision to determine