Taral wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 4:18 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>5961
>>
>> 0x44 F
>> ais523 F
>> BobTHJ F
>> comexA
>> ehirdF
>> Pavitra F
>
> COE: This omits my vote.
If the scam worked, then ehird created a rule invali
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:40 PM, Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> CoE:
>
> This is missing most of the votes that were cast on this proposal.
>
> I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal case alleging that
> the AFO violated Rule 2215 by publishing the below message in an
> attem
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:49 PM, Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rule 2034/4 (Power=3)
> Vote Protection and Cutoff for Challenges
>
> Any proposal that would otherwise change the validity of any
> existing vote on any specific unresolved Agoran decision is
> wholly withou
ehird wrote:
> 2008/11/17 Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Possibly, the declaration of invalidity did not work.. I remember some
>> rule against tampering with these things, though that might be from
>> Canada..
>>
>
> There is a rule specifically allowing ballots to be declared invalid.
You may as
2008/11/17 Joshua Boehme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Is this what you were thinking of?
>
Other rules may place further constraints on the validity of
ballots. This rule takes precedence over any rule that would
loosen the constraints specified by this rule.
On Sun, 16 Nov 2008 20:47:59 -0500
Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Elliott Hird
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2008/11/17 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >> CoE:
> >>
> >> This is missing most of the votes that were cast on this proposal.
> >>
> >> I inte
2008/11/17 Sgeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Possibly, the declaration of invalidity did not work.. I remember some
> rule against tampering with these things, though that might be from
> Canada..
>
There is a rule specifically allowing ballots to be declared invalid.
On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 8:44 PM, Elliott Hird
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/11/17 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> CoE:
>>
>> This is missing most of the votes that were cast on this proposal.
>>
>> I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal case alleging that
>> the AFO violated Ru
2008/11/17 Geoffrey Spear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> CoE:
>
> This is missing most of the votes that were cast on this proposal.
>
> I intend, with 2 support, to initiate a criminal case alleging that
> the AFO violated Rule 2215 by publishing the below message in an
> attempt to mislead other into thi
9 matches
Mail list logo
