Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5002-5004

2007-06-06 Thread Ed Murphy
Goethe wrote: Murphy wrote: And what useless dross would that be, then, specifically? Doing the quickest possible scan, Rules 2137, 2138, parts of 2141, 2143, the expansion of R789, and a pointless definition of the term "paragraph" are all signs of an overly-formalizing bureaucracy running a

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5002-5004

2007-06-06 Thread Kerim Aydin
Murphy wrote: > And what useless dross would that be, then, specifically? Doing the quickest possible scan, Rules 2137, 2138, parts of 2141, 2143, the expansion of R789, and a pointless definition of the term "paragraph" are all signs of an overly-formalizing bureaucracy running amok. Have fun wi

Re: DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5002-5004

2007-06-06 Thread Ed Murphy
Goethe wrote: Zefram wrote: Only because you lot made such a mess of the ruleset last year. Tell you one thing, I'm with Kelly here: I'm not returning until you lot stop re-introducing the useless dross we cut out. And what useless dross would that be, then, specifically?

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5002-5004

2007-06-06 Thread Kerim Aydin
Zefram wrote: > Only because you lot made such a mess of the ruleset last year. Tell you one thing, I'm with Kelly here: I'm not returning until you lot stop re-introducing the useless dross we cut out. Eris wrote: > Zefram makes too many proposals. :P Y'all should make em pay for the privileg

DIS: Re: BUS: Re: OFF: distribution of proposals 5002-5004

2007-06-06 Thread Zefram
Taral wrote: >Zefram makes too many proposals. :P Only because you lot made such a mess of the ruleset last year. Actually, the way I see it, most players are making too few proposals. But possibly it's just that they get out more. -zefram