comex wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:24 PM, comex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> 5667 O1 1.9 BobTHJ Some players are more equal than others
>> FOR*(lambda m:...
>
> Since ehird insists that \x03 doesn't count...
>
> I retract this vote and vote FOR*(lambda m:(lambda c:(lambda
> f:f(
comex wrote:
> FOR*(lambda m:(lambda c:(lambda f:f(f,0,0,[0]*1000))(lambda
> f,n,p,a:(('',a,n)) if p>=len(c) else ((lambda dc:dc[c[p]]() if c[p] in
> dc.keys() else
> f(f,n,p+1,a))({43:lambda:f(f,n,p+1,a[:n]+[(a[n]+1)%256]+a[n+1:]),45:lambda:f(f,n,p+1,a[:n]+[(a[n]-1)%256]+a[n+1:]),62:lambda:f(f,n
tusho wrote:
> 2008/7/28 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> What's that?
>>
>>
>
> eso-std.org's server, so named when we (me and ais523) were bashing
> randomly-typed names off our keyboards over IRC, and we liked that one.
>
> After a quick google, turned out it's a species in both Star Trek *a
2008/7/28 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> What's that?
>
>
eso-std.org's server, so named when we (me and ais523) were bashing
randomly-typed names off our keyboards over IRC, and we liked that one.
After a quick google, turned out it's a species in both Star Trek *and* Star
Wars.
Which was all
tusho wrote:
> You can run it on rutian. :P
What's that?
2008/7/28 Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Aha, I only have 2.2 (Zenith is still running RH9, and I still haven't
> gotten around to buying its successor).
>
>
You can run it on rutian. :P
Note that the expression evaluates to the string '\x03', but I guess maybe,
since it's a single character, w
comex wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> comex wrote:
5667 O1 1.9 BobTHJ Some players are more equal than others
>>> FOR*(lambda m:(lambda c:(lambda f:f(f,0,0,[0]*1000))(lambda
>>> f,n,p,a:(('',a,n)) if p>=len(c) else ((lambda dc:dc[c[p]
On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 11:46 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> comex wrote:
>>> 5667 O1 1.9 BobTHJ Some players are more equal than others
>> FOR*(lambda m:(lambda c:(lambda f:f(f,0,0,[0]*1000))(lambda
>> f,n,p,a:(('',a,n)) if p>=len(c) else ((lambda dc:dc[c[p]]() if c[p] in
>> dc
comex wrote:
>> 5667 O1 1.9 BobTHJ Some players are more equal than others
> FOR*(lambda m:(lambda c:(lambda f:f(f,0,0,[0]*1000))(lambda
> f,n,p,a:(('',a,n)) if p>=len(c) else ((lambda dc:dc[c[p]]() if c[p] in
> dc.keys() else
> f(f,n,p+1,a))({43:lambda:f(f,n,p+1,a[:n]+[(a[n]+1)%256]+a[n+
Roger Hicks wrote:
>Anything about this in particular that I could change to get your vote?
I dislike the general concept of a profusion of chambers, so no.
-zefram
On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hereby vote:
>>5664 D2 3BobTHJ Chambers II
> AGAINST
Anything about this in particular that I could change to get your vote?
BobTHJ
11 matches
Mail list logo
