On Wed, 5 Aug 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I support this. I think agora-actions would be an appropriate name for
>> this forum?
>>
> While it sounds like a good idea in theory I think in practice this
> would lead to a lot of NttAF messages (well, I guess actions sent to
> a-b would still be legal
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 16:12, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:51 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 15:45, Ed Murphy wrote:
>>> Even a partial diversion of traffic would help.
>>>
>> I guess I don't see how. Since it would have to be a PF every one
>> would have to be subs
Sean Hunt wrote:
> I will vehemently oppose any motion to make web interfaces
> official in any capacity, unless someone proposes a web interface that
> is neutral to all Agorans and retains the nomicness.
We can of course have _supplemental_ web interfaces to the mailing
lists, like BobTHJ's card
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 15:45, Ed Murphy wrote:
> Even a partial diversion of traffic would help.
>
I guess I don't see how. Since it would have to be a PF every one
would have to be subscribed to it anyway, so no real reduction in
message traffic. Just more work for new players (one more list to
su
BobTHJ wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 15:38, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>>> I'd like to reopen my not-really-a-proposal to split a-b into two
>>> mailing lists.
>>>
>>> One would be a high-signal list where "contentful" actions like
>>> submitting proposals
On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 15:38, Sean Hunt wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Pavitra wrote:
>> I'd like to reopen my not-really-a-proposal to split a-b into two
>> mailing lists.
>>
>> One would be a high-signal list where "contentful" actions like
>> submitting proposals, delivering judgements
Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 17:53, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Actions take place on the lists for a reason. �If actions take place
>> off-list, others have no way of verifying them.
>>
> I agree that actions take place on the lists for a reason, but I think
> those reasons can be mitigated
Much better.
But Taral was refering to the gameplay.
On Wednesday, August 5, 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 21:44, Elliott
> Hird wrote:
>> I am strongly opposed to relying on one person for historical records.
>>
> Well, as I mentioned that wouldn't be the case since all thos
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 21:44, Elliott
Hird wrote:
> I am strongly opposed to relying on one person for historical records.
>
Well, as I mentioned that wouldn't be the case since all those records
would be posted to the list on a weekly basis.
BobTHJ
I am strongly opposed to relying on one person for historical records.
On Wednesday, August 5, 2009, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 19:00, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> Again, my web-interface is already set up to record all actions and
>>> their effects, even those whi
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 19:00, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Again, my web-interface is already set up to record all actions and
>> their effects, even those which fail - and can even track the state of
>> actions which are under dispute. If you couple this with regular
>> reporting of al
Roger Hicks wrote:
> Again, my web-interface is already set up to record all actions and
> their effects, even those which fail - and can even track the state of
> actions which are under dispute. If you couple this with regular
> reporting of all those actions to the list I think this safely avoid
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 17:53, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Which is the reaction I expected and part of the reason I've held off
>> suggesting it. Though I would like to hear your reasons why you think
>> it is a bad idea.
>>
>> BobTHJ
>
> Actions take place on the lists for a reason.
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 7:53 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Roger Hicks wrote:
>> Which is the reaction I expected and part of the reason I've held off
>> suggesting it. Though I would like to hear your reasons why you think
>> it is a bad idea.
>>
>> BobTHJ
>
> Actions take place on the lists for a reason.
Roger Hicks wrote:
> Which is the reaction I expected and part of the reason I've held off
> suggesting it. Though I would like to hear your reasons why you think
> it is a bad idea.
>
> BobTHJ
Actions take place on the lists for a reason. If actions take place
off-list, others have no way of ve
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 17:17, comex wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 16:29, Taral wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
I harvest 2265 for a random land.
>>>
>>> Me too. Anyone else think the "me-too"-ness of AAA is
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 6:35 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 16:29, Taral wrote:
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>>> I harvest 2265 for a random land.
>>
>> Me too. Anyone else think the "me-too"-ness of AAA is something that
>> might be improved?
>>
> I've giv
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 16:29, Taral wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Roger Hicks wrote:
>> I harvest 2265 for a random land.
>
> Me too. Anyone else think the "me-too"-ness of AAA is something that
> might be improved?
>
I've given some thought to "webifying" the AAA, so that
contract-defi
18 matches
Mail list logo
