On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus wrote:
I am still interested, but I would like to note to ais, that I did not
receive his original message to which you are replying.
Ironically ais523 always has problems with your messages being spam
filtered, but his email workaround thi
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Nic Evans wrote:
> > On 09/11/17 22:04, VJ Rada wrote:
> > > the office is vacant, you can deputize at any time.
> >
> > Am I not assessor?
> >
>
> Are you? Apologies if I missed that...
Ok, you don't want to know how long I stare
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Nic Evans wrote:
> On 09/11/17 22:04, VJ Rada wrote:
> > the office is vacant, you can deputize at any time.
>
> Am I not assessor?
>
Are you? Apologies if I missed that...
I still need to wait for a time limit to expire.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> the office is vacant, you can deputize at any time.
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sure thing all around. Nothing's happening until Wed anyway because
> > that's the ear
i thought he meant arbitor bc we were discussing cfjs. yup, you are
the assessor.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 1:11 PM, Nic Evans wrote:
>
>
> On 09/11/17 22:04, VJ Rada wrote:
>> the office is vacant, you can deputize at any time.
>
> Am I not assessor?
>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Kerim
On 09/11/17 22:04, VJ Rada wrote:
> the office is vacant, you can deputize at any time.
Am I not assessor?
>
> On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>>
>> Sure thing all around. Nothing's happening until Wed anyway because
>> that's the earliest (I think) that any assessor duty
the office is vacant, you can deputize at any time.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 12:45 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> Sure thing all around. Nothing's happening until Wed anyway because
> that's the earliest (I think) that any assessor duty becomes late.
>
> On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
>> >I am
Sure thing all around. Nothing's happening until Wed anyway because
that's the earliest (I think) that any assessor duty becomes late.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017, VJ Rada wrote:
> >I am still interested, but I would like to note to ais, that I did not
> >receive his original message to which you are
>I am still interested, but I would like to note to ais, that I did not receive
>his original message to which you are replying.
Same.
I'm fine to judge if needed, although I strongly disclaim being reassigned 3555.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I'm not getting Ais's m
I'm not getting Ais's messages either
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 2:38 AM, Nic Evans wrote:
> I'm willing to judge, though my current situation makes timeliness a
> consideration, so probably try to give me less time-sensitive CFJs?
>
>
> On 09/11/17 19:13, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> >
> > Are Publius, o,
I am still interested, but I would like to note to ais, that I did not receive
his original message to which you are replying.
Publius Scribonius Scholasticus
p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com
> On Sep 11, 2017, at 8:13 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
>
> Are Publius, o, Aris, grok, and m
Are Publius, o, Aris, grok, and myself the only ones currently interested
in judging - any other volunteers at all?? (and I think grok has stepped down).
On Mon, 11 Sep 2017, Alex Smith wrote:
> G. wrote:
> > ais523, can you provide the list of "interested judges" you were working
> > from for
12 matches
Mail list logo