It's not even that clever, we talked about it before the proposal was
officially submitted and agreed that as it would never actually work,
hopefully no one would waste their time attempting it.
I support the intent to call in the pledge, as fingers were indeed
pointed explicitly contrary to
In addition, any other favour-granting officer (such as me) could do
EXACTLY the same thing to stop you from becoming the advisor of anyone.
On 2017-11-22 17:04, VJ Rada wrote:
Expedition is still 7 day voting period! Balloons automatically are
created at the beginning of each agoran week
Expedition is still 7 day voting period! Balloons automatically are
created at the beginning of each agoran week (next monday). So it
would have worked.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Madeline wrote:
> For the record, it wouldn't have worked. None of favours, influence, or
>
For the record, it wouldn't have worked. None of favours, influence, or
advising are secured, and with the power of expedition we could get the
proposal through before you won on balloons.
On 2017-11-22 16:58, VJ Rada wrote:
i'm s pissed that i lost the easiest win in the history of
i'm s pissed that i lost the easiest win in the history of
easy wins because of emails.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 4:58 PM, VJ Rada wrote:
> i mean yeah ok. not exactly standing for re-election here.
>
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Madeline
i mean yeah ok. not exactly standing for re-election here.
On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 4:56 PM, Madeline wrote:
> Can we just never give you any in-game power ever again
>
>
>
> On 2017-11-22 16:52, VJ Rada wrote:
>>
>> Ah... the favours don't work because it looks like agora
Can we just never give you any in-game power ever again
On 2017-11-22 16:52, VJ Rada wrote:
Ah... the favours don't work because it looks like agora hasn't
received the message causing them yet. No surprise, it's _very long.
Unfortunately, I can't award them again when the message DOES go
Ah... the favours don't work because it looks like agora hasn't
received the message causing them yet. No surprise, it's _very long.
Unfortunately, I can't award them again when the message DOES go
through because I'M NOT THE FUCKING REFEREE.
CLAAASSIC RADA LADIES AND GENTLEMEN.
On 08/29/2010 12:07 PM, Sgeo wrote:
I don't think I have the willpower to be Chroniclor... I resign from
Chroniclor
You're not allowed to do that.
-coppro
coppro wrote:
On 08/29/2010 12:07 PM, Sgeo wrote:
I don't think I have the willpower to be Chroniclor... I resign from
Chroniclor
You're not allowed to do that.
More specifically, R1006 only allows elected holders to resign. More to
the point, Chroniclor was already repealed by Proposal
comex wrote:
coppro is wrong. When I handled Proposal 6089 (Goethe), I incorrectly
removed the following text:
The author (syn.
proposer) of a proposal is the player who submitted it. The
author of a proposal may remove it from
coppro wrote:
On a related note, I retract my vote for Proposal Withdrawals and
instead vote AGAINST it.
NttPF.
On 16 Nov 2008, at 15:39, Benjamin Schultz wrote:
I nominate comex and ehird for Notary.
Absolutely happy to take it. Nothing can be as hard as Coinkeepor.
--
ehird
101 - 113 of 113 matches
Mail list logo