On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 12:53 AM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I'm a bit embarrassed about everything going on, so I'll deregister.
>
I don't believe there's such a thing as an unforgivable mistake, so I'd be
pleased to see you come back sometime. The rest of this is my attempt to
explain why these thi
I retract any and all CFJs
We could even not burden the arbitor further with text such as
"Any player may, without objection, make themselves judge of any
unassigned CFJ they reasonably believe to be wholly insubstantial
and frivolous and assign it a judgement of DISMISS"
(Stealing the words whol
On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 16:27 +1000, V.J Rada wrote:
> You're right, the rules are strangely different as to deregistration.
> Probably because it has consequences by barring you from registering for a
> while. I think when playing a game, the form "I'll do X" is acceptable as
> "I do X". eg: "I'll g
You're right, the rules are strangely different as to deregistration.
Probably because it has consequences by barring you from registering for a
while. I think when playing a game, the form "I'll do X" is acceptable as
"I do X". eg: "I'll go to attacks" is always interpreted as "I go to
attacks" in
On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 07:21 +0100, Alex Smith wrote:
> On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 16:17 +1000, V.J Rada wrote:
> > CFJ: (at the time of calling) Cuddlebeam is a player.
> >
> > Are "I'll deregister" and "I think its better for the both of us if
> > I dereg
> > for now."
> > unambiguous intent to deregi
On Fri, 2017-07-21 at 16:17 +1000, V.J Rada wrote:
> CFJ: (at the time of calling) Cuddlebeam is a player.
>
> Are "I'll deregister" and "I think its better for the both of us if I dereg
> for now."
> unambiguous intent to deregister?
This is irrelevant, unambiguously intending to deregister does
On Thu, 2017-07-20 at 22:57 -0700, Aris Merchant wrote:
> I have no clue what the appropriate response is, so I'm just going to
> restrict this to a technical point (note that I take no game actions
> in this message): you have to actually say "I deregister".
Or to clarify: you don't have to use t
You might be surprised at this, but I'll be sad to see you go, and glad if you
return. While I agree with others that certain ideas you've tried were poorly
thought out at best, and that you carried them on far longer than was wise, in
other respects you've shown some interesting capacity for ex
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 10:53 PM, Cuddle Beam wrote:
> I'm a bit embarrassed about everything going on, so I'll deregister.
>
> In my defense for the latest thing, I did take a situation which is entirely
> innocuous to the rest of the game (trust tokens, who uses them? And even
> then, you could
9 matches
Mail list logo
