On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and some non-contestants
> will presumably vote AGAINST both.
>
Hi.
--
-Iammars
www.jmcteague.com
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, comex wrote:
>> > Between when their voting periods begin and end, cast, and do
>> > not retract before the voting period ends, a ballot FOR the
>> > proposal God-emperor I, INSTEAD OF casting and not retracting
>> > a ballot FOR the proposal God-emperor II.
> I opine
Goethe wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, comex wrote:
Between when their voting periods begin and end, cast, and do
not retract before the voting period ends, a ballot FOR the
proposal God-emperor I, INSTEAD OF casting and not retracting
a ballot FOR the proposal God-empero
On 17/03/2008, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm pretty sure that "instead" is *not* the same as ~(a & ~b). "Instead"
> is (A if not B).
So if I go to Joe's for lunch, then I'm eating at home instead of
going to Joe's for lunch? Looks to me that it's a & ~b: I have to eat
at home and
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
> A if not B = A or B
Actually, its A xor B. ~(A xor B) = (A & B) | !(A & B)
It hinges on whether do "Do X instead of Y" is imperative (what is required
if you never intended to do Y in the first place?)
-G.
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 5:39 AM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
> > A if not B = A or B
>
> Actually, its A xor B. ~(A xor B) = (A & B) | !(A & B)
~(A xor B) = (A & B) | (~A & ~B) = (A & B) | ~(A | B)
> It hinges on whether do "Do X instead of
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Ian Kelly wrote:
> Then OKAY is impossible and NO WAY is trivial.
Yah, honestly, I tried to muddy the waters with "instead of" conditional if.
But when it comes right down to it (as I analyzed before doing this), given
the truth table for A and B, where A=1 => vote FOR A B=
7 matches
Mail list logo
