On 10/20/2011 02:18 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, ais523 wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 13:32 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
>>> On 10/20/2011 01:30 PM, ais523 wrote:
I continue supporting on the basis that regardless of whether Agora will
need to act quickly, that doesn't m
On Thu, 20 Oct 2011, ais523 wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 13:32 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
> > On 10/20/2011 01:30 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > > I continue supporting on the basis that regardless of whether Agora will
> > > need to act quickly, that doesn't mean that it actually /will/ be able
> > > to act
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 13:32 -0500, Pavitra wrote:
> On 10/20/2011 01:30 PM, ais523 wrote:
> > I continue supporting on the basis that regardless of whether Agora will
> > need to act quickly, that doesn't mean that it actually /will/ be able
> > to act quickly. If something (repelling invaders, for
On 10/20/2011 01:30 PM, ais523 wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 19:23 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
>> On 20 October 2011 18:58, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 00:07, woggle wrote:
I intend, with Agoran Consent, to set the Speed to Slow.
I intend, without objection,
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 19:23 +0100, Charles Walker wrote:
> On 20 October 2011 18:58, Sean Hunt wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 00:07, woggle wrote:
> >>
> >> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to set the Speed to Slow.
> >>
> >> I intend, without objection, to set the Speed to Slow.
> >>
> >> [I w
On 18 October 2011 16:35, Pavitra wrote:
>
> On 10/17/2011 11:07 PM, woggle wrote:
> > I intend, with Agoran Consent, to set the Speed to Slow.
> >
> > I intend, without objection, to set the Speed to Slow.
> >
> > [I will resolve at most one of the above intents.]
> >
> > - woggle
>
> I support.
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:07 AM, woggle wrote:
> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to set the Speed to Slow.
I support.
~ Roujo
On Mon, 2011-10-17 at 21:07 -0700, woggle wrote:
> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to set the Speed to Slow.
>
> I intend, without objection, to set the Speed to Slow.
>
> [I will resolve at most one of the above intents.]
I support both.
--
ais523
On 18 October 2011 05:07, woggle wrote:
> I intend, with Agoran Consent, to set the Speed to Slow.
I suppose.
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> For each proposal currently in the Proposal Pool, I intend, without 3
> objections, to distribute it.
There were some pretty bad and obviously unfinished proposals in this
pool. Is a third person willing to object to this? -G.
On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
> Kerim Aydin wrote:
>> On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>>> For each proposal currently in the Proposal Pool, I intend, without 3
>>> objections, to distribute it.
>>
>> I object. Every person is allowed one free by announcement per week
>> right now.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
> I'm not anti-Distributability, I'm
> anti-the-lull-in-distribution-indirectly-caused-by-cards-through-no-fault-in-the-proposal's-design.
Maybe the proposals in the pool just aren't that good.
Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2009 at 2:49 PM, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> For each proposal currently in the Proposal Pool, I intend, without 3
>> objections, to distribute it.
>
> I object to all of these. I nominate myself as Promotor, but will
> drop out in favor of any pro-Distributability
Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2009, Sean Hunt wrote:
>> For each proposal currently in the Proposal Pool, I intend, without 3
>> objections, to distribute it.
>
> I object. Every person is allowed one free by announcement per week
> right now. That should be plenty fast. -G.
It would be
14 matches
Mail list logo
